Near the end of my sermon on Sunday I talked about the reason for evil and suffering. This is always a difficult subject for anyone to grapple with. Emotions run high. It affects us at a level we can't even understand. It has brought the greatest theologians and scholars to their knees. It can ruin or restore a person's faith. So I want to make sure you understand what I meant on Sunday.
Here's the point: God ordained evil and suffering because, ultimately, it was the only way for us to see the
depth of his love. If a person doesn't see the extent of his love (this is what the apostle Paul refers to in Ephesians 3:18), then they cannot
fully enjoy God. And if God is not fully enjoyed by us, then he will not be
fully glorified. As John Piper always says, "God is most glorified when we are most satisfied in him". This is true. We bring glory to someone when we enjoy that person. When we say, "I only want to be with you", we are bathing that person in dignity, honor, and glory. When we desire "other loves", we rip the dignity from that person and make him look less than valuable. This creates a furious anger and profound grief. It rips a person of her God-given honor and dignity they were created with. So the principle is established: we bring more honor and glory to someone the more we are satisfied with him or her.
Now, imagine that you were married to someone who, before you met him, had saved many lives, started orphanages, found cures for the worst diseases, wrote the best songs in the world, was given a Nobel peace prize for ending all hostilities between Jews and Gentiles, and was known as the kindest, most loving person who ever lived. How tragic would it be if you never found out about any of this? How awful. Would you be able to enjoy him? Yes. Would you be able to fully enjoy him? No. I cannot fathom being married to someone who had done all that, but never realizing it.
The same is true with God. It would be tragic if we lived throughout eternity never knowing how deep his love really runs. Tragic is the only word I can think of. Yes, it's a wonderful thing to see someone love a friend, but it's breathtaking to see someone love an enemy. Maybe for a good man someone might die, but a sinner? What kind of love is this? I'll tell you what kind of love it is:
it's the type of love that can only be expressed through grace, mercy, and compassion. If there's no evil and sin, God can't reveal his grace; he can't reveal his mercy. If there's no suffering, God can't reveal his compassion. In short, if there's no sin, suffering, and evil, God can't reveal the depth of his love, we can't see the extent of his glory, therefore we won't be fully satisfied in him and he won't be fully glorified in us.
Read the book of Ephesians. Look at the reasons for God's redemptive plan. It's always the same: to reveal his grace, to reveal the
depth of his love - "to the praise of his glorious grace". Why does Paul pray that we would know, not just God's love, but the
depth of his love (3:15-18)? Well, it's not to stroke our egos. He does so for this stated reason: "that we might be filled up to
all the
fullness of God" (3:19). Fullness. All. Those are key words. What does Jesus pray in his high priestly prayer in John 17? "I am coming to you now, but I say these things while I am still in the world, so that they may have the
full measure of my joy within them."
Remember this verse from Romans 3? - "Someone might argue, 'If my falsehood enhances God's truthfulness and so increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner?'" (Romans 3:7). I won't address the answer to that question, because that's not the issue of this blog post. I will, however, observe that one part of this question is definitely true: our sin increases God's glory. How? By giving him the opportunity to display his grace and mercy - attributes that never would have been known if it weren't for sin, suffering, and evil.
It seems to me that one is left with only two options: the position I just described, or open theism. And if open theism is right, then we really have a problem on our hands, because if God purposefully limited his knowledge of future events, then he made a cosmic mistake, and what's to say he won't make one again?